Archive | August, 2012

31 August 2012 ~ 0 Comments

Labour leader, families call for tougher measures to prosecute workplace deaths Read it on Global News: Global BC | Labour leader, families call for tougher measures to prosecute workplace deaths

It’s been almost four years since Tracey Phan’s father was severely brain damaged at a mushroom farm near Vancouver where three others were killed when toxic gas leaked into a small shed on the site.

An investigation by WorkSafe BC, the province’s workers’ compensation board, later identified a litany of violations that contributed to the deaths, and the farm’s owners were fined hundreds of thousands dollars after pleading guilty to breaking occupational health and safety laws.
Read it on Global News: Global BC | Labour leader, families call for tougher measures to prosecute workplace deaths

 

http://www.globaltvbc.com/labour+leader+families+call+for+tougher+measures+to+prosecute+workplace+deaths/6442705373/story.html

Continue Reading

29 August 2012 ~ 0 Comments

Grieving Families Want Tougher Justice for Workplace Deaths

The tall, rugged former logger and heavy equipment operator is talking about the Peter Kiewit Sons & Company managers and supervisors whom he holds responsible for his son Sam’s death.

Sam Fitzpatrick was crushed by a falling boulder at a worksite on Toba Inlet in 2009, in an incident that a Worksafe BC inspector said reflected “reckless and grossly negligent” decision making by company management who had ordered heavy equipment to operate upslope from where Sam and his brother Arlen were working despite an incident the previous day in which a huge rock came down the slope and barely missed workers below. Arlen saw his brother die.

http://thetyee.ca/News/2012/08/28/BC-Workplace-Deaths/

Continue Reading

28 August 2012 ~ 0 Comments

Workplace Safety Infographic

Workplace fatality data

http://complianceandsafety.com/blog/workplace-safety-infographic-workplace-fatality-data/

 

 

Continue Reading

24 August 2012 ~ 0 Comments

DeIorio Foods cited by OSHA for safety violations, faces nearly $55k in fines

By WKTV News

Story Created: Aug 22, 2012 at 3:20 PM EDT

UTICA, N.Y. - Utica food processing company Delorio Foods Inc. has been cited by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration with 14 alleged serious violations at the company’s Bleecker Street manufacturing facility for exposing workers to unsafe working conditions.

Proposed penalties total $54,900 following an inspection initiated by OSHA in May.

“In one instance, the floor was coated with oil near a hot press, and in another, the exit route from a storage area was obstructed by a pallet of food and a trash can,” said Chris Adams, OSHA’s area director for Syracuse. “Failing to correct the hazards would continue to expose workers to the dangers of falls, chemical burns, getting caught in a machine or being unable to exit the workplace swiftly in the event of an emergency.”

The inspection found that working area floors were not kept free from slippery conditions and the exit route from a storage area was obstructed by a pallet of food and a trash can. OSHA inspectors also found that employees who were exposed to corrosive materials lacked adequate stations for quick flushing of the eyes and body if they came in contact with the materials. Additionally, inspectors found that the devices intended to be used for locking and tagging out the energy sources of machinery were being used incorrectly as personal locks in the men’s locker room. A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

“An effective illness and injury prevention program in which workers and managers work together to identify and eliminate hazardous conditions can prevent injuries from occurring in the first place,” said Robert Kulick, OSHA’s regional administrator in New York.

Delorio Foods Inc. has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and proposed penalties to comply, meet with OSHA’s area director or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Officials with DeIorio’s say that the company was very surprised by the recent citation issued by OSHA.

“DeIorio’s is committed to maintaining a safe workplace, has a well-established safety program and possesses an exemplary safety record. Among other things, DeIorio’s has a joint safety
committee with the union that represents manufacturing and sanitation employees, which actively monitors safety in the company’s manufacturing facility,” the company stated in a release.

“In addition to these internal efforts, DeIorio’s operations are audited by the American Institute for Baking, an outside industry consultant. As part of the annual audit, this outside consulting firm assesses the operations at the facility against industry standards and recognized good manufacturing processes. For each of the past five years, DeIorio’s has received a rating of “Superior” from the AIB.”

“We make ever effort to constantly monitor and improve upon workplace safety based on GMP,” said Michelle Burnett, General Manager at DeIorio’s. “We feel that it is imperative that we maintain a safe working environment, both for the benefit of our employees and our clients.”

Continue Reading

21 August 2012 ~ 0 Comments

ONLINE SAFETY: Create a cyber security plan for your business

Last time I wrote about creating a plan for online safety at home. Now we need to think about the workplace.

Small businesses are at risk just as much as the large corporations we hear about in the news every day.

Recently, the Business Week article “The Cost of Cyber Crime” estimated the cost of cyber crime and cyber defense. The cyber defense numbers reference the money it costs for business to recover from an attack. Large corporations may have the insurance or reserves to pay those costs, but many small businesses are just making payroll. A cyber attack on a small business could end the business.

http://www.heritage.com/articles/2012/08/18/opinion/doc502fa2b305269261153100.txt

 

Continue Reading

17 August 2012 ~ 0 Comments

Fine companies more for deaths – expert

New Zealand companies found guilty of corporate manslaughter should face heavier fines and the potential to be sued, a corporate law expert says.

Auckland University Commercial Law Professor Susan Watson said the  Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) regime had led to a corporate environment where no one individual was ever held responsible and penalties were weak.

Heavier penalties would act as an incentive for companies to “grow a conscience” and take responsibility for workplace safety, she said.

In a major study into workplace safety, Watson’s research found that New Zealand had twice the rate of workplace fatalities as Australia.

The serious injury statistics were “very high and worrying”, she said. There were 41 work-related deaths reported to the Department of Labour in 2011.

A New Zealand company charged over a workplace fatality would face a maximum fine of $500,000 for a ‘knowing’ offence under current legislation.

An Australian company could be fined up to $3 million for the same offence.

Watson said there was no reason for corporations to improve safety levels because they couldn’t be sued under New Zealand law for personal injury.

“Individuals are careful because, for most of us, hurting or killing someone is not something we want to carry around for the rest of our lives.

“However, the corporate entity itself has no conscience, no matter what individuals within the corporation think.”

It was time for New Zealand to consider models in other countries where companies could be sued for personal injury, Watson said.

According to statistics compiled by Watson, the rate of workplace-related accidents increased during the period when ACC was introduced in the 1970s, while Australia’s figures trended down.

“New Zealand’s ACC is unique. It’s what differentiates us from the rest of the world.

“But perhaps it also doesn’t incentivise companies to work hard enough to ensure workplace safety is strictly adhered to.”

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment Labour Group spokeswoman Rachel McQuillan said the ministry was unable to comment on whether heavier penalties would be effective.

The ministry had a number of tools it could use in terms of enforcement action which were proven to be effective, she said.

“We do believe that targeting high risk industries with information, education and compliance campaigns can have a positive effect on the work toll.”

Three safety programmes, part of which focused on compliance, were being run as part of a plan targeting the five sectors with the highest incidence of workplace health and safety injuries.

- © Fairfax NZ News  16/8/2012

Continue Reading

15 August 2012 ~ 0 Comments

The monetary value of a human life

Key takeaways:

  • Japan places the highest value on a human life, spending $11,728,000 to save a single life through improvements in public safety.
  • South Korea spent the least, at a measly $878,000.00 per life saved.
  • Health insurance companies value life at $50,000 per year of quality life, a depressingly low number compared to what government entities will pay.
  • The families of suicide bombers receive just $25,000 per suicide.
  • While the families that lossed a loved one on 9/11 received an average of $2.1 million per death, families of fallen soldiers receive a maximum of just $400,000. Rush Limbaugh did an interesting piece about this huge disparity back in 2002.
Please read on courtesy of   complianceandsafety.com  about safety in the workplace

http://complianceandsafety.com/blog/infographic-the-monetary-value-of-a-human-life/

Continue Reading

14 August 2012 ~ 0 Comments

New book on OHS laws challenges current understandings of workplace safety

With the change of political heart from some of Australia’s state governments over the harmonisation of occupational health and safety laws, many academic and legal publishers revised their book plans as the national market was less national. However, some continued to publish understanding that although OHS harmonisation had a political deadline of 1 January 2012, refinement of the laws would continue for several years.

 

http://safetyatworkblog.com/2012/08/06/new-book-on-ohs-laws-challenges-current-understandings-of-workplace-safety/

Continue Reading

10 August 2012 ~ 0 Comments

Maryland Workplace Injuries Cost Hundreds Of Millions, Report Says

Construction injuries and fatalities cost the state of Maryland more than $700 million between 2008 and 2010, according to a report released Tuesday by Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group.

The report, “The Price of Inaction: A Comprehensive Look at the Costs of Injuries and Fatalities in the Construction Industry,” suggests that the state could save money by awarding construction contracts to companies with strong safety records. Under the current system, Maryland screens potential companies based on past performance, bonding capacity and legal proceedings — but there is no pre-qualification process based on health and safety records.

The fatalities, injuries and massive costs that result from the lack of such criteria underscore the need for reform, the report says.

“The number [$712.8] million is really nothing to sneeze at,” said Keith Wrightson, the report’s author and worker safety and health advocate for Public Citizen. “We think that this is costing the economy a lot of money, number one, but it’s also a deterrent for workers to enter the construction industry. We need highly trained individuals to build our infrastructure and safety should be a goal of all employers.”

“Everybody should have access to the public construction market but it needs to be done in a safe way where everybody’s protected,” Wrightson said. “The interests of business can’t supersede the workers.”

Mike Henderson, president of the Baltimore Metro chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors, said he agreed something needed to be done about workplace safety in the state — but he disagreed with Public Citizen’s recommendation about creating a pre-qualification process based on health and safety records.

“On the surface, it sounds like a great idea,” said Henderson, who stressed that any solution “needs to be much more thoughtful and nuanced than typically you see coming out of regulations and government.”

Henderson cautioned against evaluating the health and safety records of general contractors, which often rely on subcontractors, because they have to “accept bids at the very last minute because that’s the nature of public bidding.” As a result, general contractors may not have time to verify the safety records of each subcontractor. He said he supported job-specific safety training instead.

The Public Citizen report got its figure by tallying up the costs from three general categories: “direct costs” like hospital or physician payments, “indirect costs,” such as productivity losses or administrative costs, and “quality of life costs,” or “the value attributed to the pain and suffering of victims.” This methodology comes from a 2004 report by Waehrer et al., economists who looked specifically at the cost of occupational injuries in the American construction industry.

The construction industry is one of the most dangerous job sectors in the country. In 2010, it ranked second to the transportation industry in workplace deaths, with 780 fatalities, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In Maryland, 55 construction workers died from 2008 to 2010, according to the Public Citizen report.

Although no state as of yet has a prequalification process for public construction contracts based on occupational safety and health, Wrightson said that Maryland could be a good place to start. For instance, despite the study’s findings, Maryland had the eighth fewest worker fatalities in the country in 2010, according to the AFL-CIO. And as the Public Citizen report notes, updating the state’s existing contractor pre-qualification process to include safety or health standards would be “fairly simple to implement.”

 

Huff post Politics 9 August 2012

Continue Reading

08 August 2012 ~ 0 Comments

Federation focuses on workplace safety

The Food Storage and Distribution Federation (FSDF) has set up a new committee to help its members reduce the risk of workplace accidents and fatalities.

Set up to tackle the high rate of accidents in the food logistics industry, which sees 200 people struck by forklifts and other vehicles every year, the Technical and Safety Committee will disseminate information about legislation and safety regulations, and share best-practice in the field.

Chris Sturman, CEO of FSDF, said: “Health and safety in the workplace is such an important issue, historically and currently, and the FSDF’s Technical and Safety committee represents the future. It demonstrates the prowess, knowledge and experience of highly professional individuals with a great depth of experience in the food and drink logistics supply chain.

“The committee is comprised of experienced individuals in engineering and refrigeration, as well as safety advisors and specialists who use their best practice to enhance services for FSDF members. The committee’s sole aim is to support and advise the FSDF’s members, and we’re delighted with their achievements so far.”

In addition to launching ‘The Loading Bay Safety Guide’, which highlights the hazards faced in the workplace and gives advice on how to avoid injuries and death, the committee will focus on a number of legislative concerns in coming months, including an initiative to ensure compliance to with EU regulations on refrigeration systems using ammonia.

“It is essential that the risks surrounding these systems are recognised and managed correctly to ensure any risks to the health of workers dealing with explosive substances are eliminated,” said Sturman.

Technical and safety matters will also be an integral part of the FSDF’s upcoming annual conference, which has been organised in conjunction with the British Frozen Food Federation (BFFF).

The ‘Food Supply Chain Excellence – Challenges and Opportunities’ event will take place on 1 October 2012 in Nottingham and will include keynote sessions from government and manufacturing, covering a range of issues related to the current economic climate and the opportunities and challenges it represents to the food industry.

Breakout sessions will include a focus on new Climate Change Agremeents and ammonia-driven refrigeration plant regulations.

 

meatinfo.co.uk

Continue Reading